Close Menu
Must Have Gadgets –

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Best Smart Home Safes for 2025: We Cracked the Code

    November 28, 2025

    GM tech executive shakeup continues on software team

    November 28, 2025

    30+ wall chargers tested and compared!

    November 28, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Must Have Gadgets –
    Trending
    • Best Smart Home Safes for 2025: We Cracked the Code
    • GM tech executive shakeup continues on software team
    • 30+ wall chargers tested and compared!
    • Tech firm’s new CTO gets indicted; company then claims he was never CTO
    • PrivadoVPN Free review: the best of the no-cost bunch
    • 4 Stephen King adaptations that are actually better than the books
    • Score a WYZE Cam v4 2-pack for less than $40 in a holiday special
    • New Colorways Are Coming For The Hikawa iPhone Grip
    • Home
    • Shop
      • Earbuds & Headphones
      • Smartwatches
      • Mobile Accessories
      • Smart Home Devices
      • Laptops & Tablets
    • Gadget Reviews
    • How-To Guides
    • Mobile Accessories
    • Smart Devices
    • More
      • Top Deals
      • Smart Home
      • Tech News
      • Trending Tech
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Must Have Gadgets –
    Home»Tech News»Why did NASA’s chief just shake up the agency’s plans to land on the Moon?
    Tech News

    Why did NASA’s chief just shake up the agency’s plans to land on the Moon?

    adminBy adminOctober 21, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Why did NASA’s chief just shake up the agency’s plans to land on the Moon?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NASA would not easily be able to rip up its existing HLS contracts with SpaceX and Blue Origin, as especially with the former much of the funding has already been awarded for milestone payments. Rather, Duffy would likely have to find new funding from Congress. And it would not be cheap. This NASA analysis, from 2017, estimates that a cost-plus, sole-source lunar lander would cost $20 billion to $30 billion, or nearly 10 times what NASA awarded to SpaceX in 2021.

    SpaceX founder Elon Musk, responding to Duffy’s comments, seemed to relish the challenge posed by industry competitors.

    “SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” Musk said on the social media site he owns, X. “Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.”

    The timing

    Duffy’s remarks on television on Monday morning, although significant for the broader space community, also seemed intended for an audience of one—President Trump.

    The president appointed Duffy, already leading the Department of Transportation, to lead NASA on an interim basis in July. This came six weeks after the president rescinded his nomination of billionaire and private astronaut Jared Isaacman, for political reasons, to lead the space agency.

    Trump was under the impression that Duffy would use this time to shore up NASA’s leadership while also looking for a permanent chief of the space agency. However, Duffy appears to have not paid more than lip service to finding a successor.

    Since late summer there has been a groundswell of support for Isaacman in the White House, and among some members of Congress. The billionaire has met with Trump several times, both at the White House and Mar-a-Lago, and sources report that the two have a good rapport. There has been some momentum toward the president re-nominating Isaacman, with Trump potentially making a decision soon. Duffy’s TV appearances on Monday morning appear to be part of an effort to forestall this momentum by showing Trump he is actively working toward a lunar landing during his second term, which ends in January 2029.

    agencys chief land Moon NASAs Plans shake
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Tech firm’s new CTO gets indicted; company then claims he was never CTO

    November 28, 2025

    Glīd won Startup Battlefield 2025 by building solutions to make logistics simpler, safer, and smarter

    November 28, 2025

    I’m saving up to 75% off on the best Black Friday deals from Amazon, Walmart, Target & more

    November 27, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Best Smart Home Safes for 2025: We Cracked the Code

    November 28, 2025

    PayPal’s blockchain partner accidentally minted $300 trillion in stablecoins

    October 16, 2025

    The best AirPods deals for October 2025

    October 16, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    How-To Guides

    How to Disable Some or All AI Features on your Samsung Galaxy Phone

    By adminOctober 16, 20250
    Gadget Reviews

    PayPal’s blockchain partner accidentally minted $300 trillion in stablecoins

    By adminOctober 16, 20250
    Smart Devices

    The best AirPods deals for October 2025

    By adminOctober 16, 20250

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Latest Post

    Best Smart Home Safes for 2025: We Cracked the Code

    November 28, 2025

    GM tech executive shakeup continues on software team

    November 28, 2025

    30+ wall chargers tested and compared!

    November 28, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • Best Smart Home Safes for 2025: We Cracked the Code
    • GM tech executive shakeup continues on software team
    • 30+ wall chargers tested and compared!
    • Tech firm’s new CTO gets indicted; company then claims he was never CTO
    • PrivadoVPN Free review: the best of the no-cost bunch

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2025 must-have-gadgets.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.