To find the ‘Best TV’ means cutting through marketing hype, contradictory reviews, and hidden agendas. After 25+ years following the home theater market and more than 50 years of combined team experience in consumer technology, we’ve built what we confidently call the most comprehensive, unbiased TV ranking available anywhere on the internet.
The Problem We Solved
Most “best of” lists miss the mark — they’re rushed out right after launch, based on one reviewer’s personal taste, and often shaped by hidden affiliate incentives. We wanted none of that. So we built our ranking system from the ground up to remove bias, focus on long-term performance, and actually make fair, apples-to-apples comparisons that mean something to real buyers.
Our Proprietary Approach
We don’t just rely on one person’s opinion — that’s not how you get a fair ranking. Instead, we use a proprietary scoring system that pulls data from everywhere that matters: professional testing labs, blind shootouts, trusted tech publications, expert reviewers, enthusiast communities, and verified buyer feedback — along with our own hands-on testing. And to keep things truly fair, our own results don’t get special treatment; they’re weighed just like every other pro source. The result is a system that blends hard data, expert analysis, and real-world feedback to deliver rankings you can actually trust.
Bias-Proof by Design
Our team handles the research and data collection, but no single person has the power to sway the results. The rankings come straight from the numbers — not opinions. Our multi-source system crunches data from across the industry to find real consensus, not personal bias. We don’t take paid placements, we keep full editorial control, and we always wait until the market settles before calling any winner.
The result: Rankings you can trust because they reflect industry consensus through a bias-proof framework that puts your needs first.
TV Category Winners
🥇 Best Overall
🥇 Best Overall
Samsung S95F QD-OLED
$2,299
The Samsung S95F QD-OLED TV scored a 91.3 out of 100 points.
💰 Best Value
💰 Best Value
The TCL QM8K Mini-LED scored 89.5 points out of 100 to earn the “Best Value” title.
🎮 Best Gaming OLED
🎮 Best Gaming OLED
Samsung S95F QD-OLED
$2,299
The Samsung S95F QD-OLED TV scored a 91.3 out of 100 points.
🎮 Best Gaming Under $1000
🎮 Best Gaming Under $1000
The TCL QM7K scored 81.9 points out of 100.
🎮 Best Gaming Under $500
🎮 Best Gaming Under $500
The TCL QM6K scored 80.5 points out of 100.
🎬 Best for Movies
🎬 Best for Movies
Sony BRAVIA 8 II OLED
$2,299
The Sony BRAVIA 8 II OLED scored 90.8 out of 100 points.
🖼️ Best Picture Quality
🖼️ Best Picture Quality
Sony BRAVIA 8 II OLED
$2,299
The Sony BRAVIA 8 II OLED scored 90.8 out of 100 points.
☀️ Best Bright Room TV
☀️ Best Bright Room TV
Samsung S95F QD-OLED
$2,299
The Samsung S95F QD-OLED TV scored a 91.3 out of 100 points.
🌈 Best HDR Performance
🌈 Best HDR Performance
Panasonic Z95B OLED
$2,197
The Panasonic Z95B OLED scored 87.2 points out of a possible 100.
💎 Best Mini-LED
💎 Best Mini-LED
The TCL QM8K scored 89.5 out of a possible 100 points.
⚡ Brightest TV Under $1,500
⚡ Brightest TV Under $1,500
The Hisense U8QG scored 87.9 out of a possible 100 points.
Show More Products
Best Overall TV
This TV scored the best on our proprietary scoring system, with a score of 91.3 out of 100. It should come as no surprise, as this is one of the best OLEDs on the market, not to mention the brightest and the only one with an anti-glare coating.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star
The Samsung S95F didn’t just top our charts — it crushed them. It’s the rare TV that nails both extremes: reference-level picture quality in a pitch-black theater and perfect visibility in a bright living room. That balance is nearly impossible to pull off, but the S95F makes it look easy.
In our weighted testing, it scored an incredible 38/40 in picture quality, 18/20 for gaming, and 12.5/15 in features — with zero real weaknesses to speak of. Eight major YouTube reviewers crowned it their “Best TV,” and it still managed a strong second in professional shootouts. Bottom line: no other TV blends accuracy and real-world usability quite like the S95F.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Only glare-proof OLED available
- Brightest OLED at 2,100+ nits
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports
- 9.5ms latency beats gaming monitors
- Perfect blacks in any lighting
Cons
- No Dolby Vision
- $1,500 premium over Mini-LED alternatives
- 267nits full-screen brightness limitation
- Tizen OS lacks Google Cast
- Minor matte coating controversy among purists
The Standout Feature
Samsung has a matte anti-reflection coating which represents the biggest OLED innovation in years, eliminating 99.8% of reflections without the “gray haze” that plagued previous attempts. During testing with a 1000-lumen lamp aimed directly at the screen, reflections appeared dimmer than a candle flame – solving OLED’s fatal flaw.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (38/40): Samsung’s third-gen QD-OLED panel is a powerhouse. By combining quantum dots with self-emissive pixels, it delivers jaw-dropping visuals that put most rivals to shame. Peak brightness hits 2,147 nits (10% window) — making it the brightest OLED we’ve ever tested, nearly 90% brighter than LG’s C5. Color accuracy is top-tier with 98% DCI-P3 coverage and a Delta-E under 1.8 straight out of the box.
The contrast ratio is infinite, giving you true blacks with zero blooming. It only loses a point for slightly elevated blacks in bright rooms due to the matte coating, and another because Samsung’s processor, while impressive, still isn’t quite as sharp as Sony’s XR Cognitive chip when upscaling 1080p content. The only real limit? Full-screen brightness caps at 267 nits — though Samsung’s tone-mapping keeps highlights detailed and natural.
Gaming Performance (18/20): This is as good as gaming gets on a TV. Input lag is an ultra-responsive 9.5ms at 4K/60Hz and just 5.2ms at 120Hz — literally faster than human reaction time. You get four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports (48Gbps each) ready for anything from PS5 to RTX 4090. VRR runs perfectly between 20-144Hz, with FreeSync Premium Pro and G-Sync both fully certified. Even in Game Mode, the S95F retains about 95% of its picture quality, which is nearly unheard of. The only knock? No Dolby Vision gaming, so Xbox Series X players miss out there.
Smart TV & Features (12.5/15): Tizen still divides opinion, but it’s snappy and reliable — 8-second boot times, smooth scrolling, and every major streaming app onboard. Samsung’s SmartThings integration remains best-in-class, and the solar-powered remote means you’ll never hunt for batteries again. Sports fans will love Multi-View, which can display up to four sources at once. The only real misses: no built-in Google Cast and no hands-free voice control, both of which competitors now include.
Sound Quality (8/10): The built-in 60W 2.1.2 Object Tracking Sound+ system delivers crisp dialogue and convincing directional effects that move with the on-screen action. Dolby Atmos decoding adds height and space, though bass rolls off around 80Hz. Realistically, most users will still want a dedicated soundbar, but for built-in audio, it’s better than most.
Build & Value (13.3/15): The S95F looks every bit like a flagship. It’s just 15.4mm thin, framed by barely-there bezels and solid metal construction that feels premium from every angle. At $2,799, it’s pricey — about $1,500 more than TCL’s QM8K — but you’re paying for Samsung’s revolutionary matte finish, unmatched OLED contrast, perfect viewing angles, and pixel-level dimming that Mini-LED still can’t touch. It’s a premium experience through and through — and it earns every dollar.
Best For
- Bright living rooms with unavoidable windows
- Mixed gaming and premium content viewing
- Households needing one TV for everything
- Those willing to pay for zero compromises
Bottom line
The Samsung S95F isn’t just an incremental upgrade – it’s a paradigm shift. By conquering OLED’s greatest weakness while preserving its greatest strength, Samsung created the first truly versatile flagship. At $2,799, you’re paying early adopter prices for technology that simply didn’t exist before. For those seeking one TV to excel at Sunday football, Friday night movies, and Saturday gaming sessions without switching rooms or closing curtains, this is the only option that genuinely delivers everything.
Best Picture Quality
When it comes to TVs, the picture quality is a huge feature that is sometimes overlooked. Sony’s Bravia 8 II OLED has the best picture quality right now, and that should not be a surprise, considering Sony does have a movie studio, and they want their movies to look good on their TVs.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The Sony Bravia 8 II OLED came in just shy of the top spot — but when it comes to pure picture accuracy, nothing else touches it. It swept two professional blind shootouts and absolutely crushed our image-quality metrics with a 37.5/40 score. This is the TV that professional calibrators buy for themselves — not because it’s flashy, but because it gets every pixel exactly right.
Build quality is rock-solid, as you’d expect from Sony, but limited gaming features (16.5/20) and a higher price kept it from taking the crown. Still, if you care more about cinematic precision than frame rates or marketing buzzwords, the Bravia 8 II is the one to beat.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Unmatched processing and upscaling
- Won professional accuracy shootouts
- Reference-grade out-of-box calibration
- Acoustic Surface Audio innovation
- Best motion handling without artifacts
Cons
- Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports limits gaming
- 13.6ms lag noticeable for competitive play
- Lower brightness than QD-OLED competitors
- $200 premium over Samsung S95F
- Missing advanced gaming features
The Standout Feature
Sony’s XR Cognitive Processor remains untouchable for real-world content. It makes 1080p streaming look like 4K, removes compression artifacts in real-time, and handles motion with zero soap opera effect. In shootouts, judges consistently ranked it first for “creator’s intent” and SDR accuracy.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (37.5/40): Sony’s magic formula is alive and well here — the Bravia 8 II pairs a standard WOLED panel with Sony’s world-class image processing to stunning effect. Peak brightness hits 1,850 nits, a bit shy of Samsung’s 2,147, but Sony’s tone mapping is simply better. It preserves every highlight and shadow detail without clipping — the kind of control you only notice once you’ve seen it side-by-side. Color accuracy is reference-grade with 95% DCI-P3 coverage and a Delta-E under 1.5 right out of the box. Blacks are truly infinite, and near-black detail is handled with such precision that it won multiple shootouts. Sony’s Reality Creation upscaling engine is pure sorcery — even compressed 1080p Netflix streams look convincingly 4K. It only drops a few points for brightness trailing behind QD-OLEDs and Samsung’s superior color volume.
Gaming Performance (16.5/20): Gaming is good, but not class-leading. Input lag clocks in at 13.6ms at 4K/60Hz, which competitive players might notice, though it’s fine for story-driven titles. You get two HDMI 2.1 ports, both capable of 4K/120Hz with VRR (48–120Hz), but no FreeSync or G-Sync, which hurts PC gaming compatibility. On the plus side, Sony’s Game Mode keeps that signature image fidelity intact — color accuracy and motion remain beautifully consistent, even when the GPU is doing the heavy lifting.
Smart TV & Features (13/15): Sony’s Google TV setup continues to be the best in the business — lightning-fast with 6-second boot times and smooth app performance across the board. Hands-free Google Assistant works flawlessly for quick commands, and the inclusion of Apple HomeKit and Google Home means it plays nice with almost any ecosystem. The exclusive Bravia Core streaming service is the hidden gem here — with 80Mbps bitrates, it’s as close as you’ll get to 4K Blu-ray quality from a streaming app, and it’s tailor-made to show off what this panel can do.
Sound Quality (9/10): Sony’s Acoustic Surface Audio+ tech never gets old — the screen itself is the speaker, so dialogue literally comes from where the actor’s mouth is on-screen. It’s an immersive effect you can’t un-hear once you experience it. The 30W system doesn’t rumble with deep bass, but it nails clarity and separation. Dolby Atmos support adds convincing height effects, giving you a genuinely cinematic soundstage without a soundbar.
Build & Value (15.5/20): Everything about the Bravia 8 II feels premium — from its brushed aluminum frame to the weighted, cable-managed stand that screams high-end. At $2,999, it’s about $200 more than Samsung’s S95F, but with fewer gaming perks and less brightness. Still, you’re paying for Sony’s unmatched processing and accuracy — not raw specs. If that’s your priority, it’s worth every penny. But if you just want sheer brightness for half the cost, TCL’s QM8K gets you about 80% there for 43% of the price.
Best for
- Movie enthusiasts seeking director’s vision
- Cable/streaming viewers with mixed-quality sources
- Professional video editors needing accuracy
- Those valuing processing over specifications
Bottom Line
The Bravia 8 II represents the purist’s choice – a TV that prioritizes doing the fundamentals perfectly over chasing specification wins. Sony’s processing advantage means real-world content from cable boxes, streaming services, and Blu-rays looks better here than anywhere else. At $2,999, it demands a premium for subtler improvements that videophiles will appreciate but casual viewers might not notice. For those whose priority is experiencing content exactly as creators intended, with every frame optimized by industry-leading processing, nothing else comes close.
Best Mini-LED TV
Mini-LED is a booming technology for TVs lately. Largely because of how bright Mini-LED can be, while keeping picture quality top-notch. And when it comes to Mini-LED, the TCL QM8K is the best option available right now.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The TCL QM8K earned its position by delivering 90% of flagship performance at 46% of flagship pricing. Our scoring revealed exceptional picture quality (35/40) and strong gaming features (17/20) that compete directly with TVs costing twice as much. YouTube reviewers unanimously crowned it “the TV to beat” for value, while community forums rated it the best purchase over $1000.
It proves Chinese manufacturers have caught up to – and in some areas surpassed – traditional premium brands.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Incredible 3,500 nits peak brightness
- 2,000+ local dimming zones at this price
- Native 144Hz refresh rate
- Competes with TVs costing $1,000+ more
- Minimal blooming for Mini-LED
Cons
- ATSC 3.0 implementation spotty
- Build quality reflects price point
- Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports
- Viewing angles typical of LCD
- Not quite OLED black levels
The Standout Feature
The staggering 2,000+ local dimming zones deliver Mini-LED performance that rivals OLED in dark room viewing. Most competitors at this price offer 200-500 zones. TCL’s implementation minimizes blooming so effectively that side-by-side with OLEDs, viewers often can’t distinguish the black levels.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (35/40): Mini-LED technology reaches maturity here with 3,500 nits peak brightness – 90% brighter than Sony’s Bravia 8 II and approaching professional mastering monitor levels. The massive zone count enables 20,000:1 contrast ratio with local dimming active, producing convincing blacks with minimal blooming. Color coverage hits 97% DCI-P3 thanks to quantum dot enhancement. The only deductions come from viewing angles (typical LCD limitation) and processing that, while good, can’t match Sony or Samsung’s flagship chips. TCL’s AIPQ Pro processor handles motion well with minimal artifacts.
Gaming Performance (17/20): Impressive but not perfect with 13.6ms input lag at 4K/60Hz – slightly higher than Samsung/LG but still competitive. Native 144Hz refresh rate stands out, with many competitors limited to 120Hz. However, only two HDMI 2.1 ports restrict multi-device setups. VRR works smoothly from 48-144Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro certification. Game mode maintains excellent picture quality with minimal degradation.
Smart TV & Features (13/15): Google TV runs smoothly with 7-second boot times and comprehensive app selection. The included voice remote works well, though lacks the premium feel of Samsung’s solar remote. Unique additions include built-in Onkyo 2.1 audio tuning and surprisingly good cable management for the price point.
Sound Quality (7/10): The 30W 2.1 system delivers adequate performance with clear dialogue and some bass presence. Dolby Atmos support adds spatial dimension though height effects are subtle. At this price point, the audio outperforms expectations but still benefits from a soundbar.
Build & Value (16.5/20): Construction feels solid if not luxurious – plastic predominates but assembly is tight. The central stand design works on smaller furniture. At $1,299, value is exceptional. You’re getting brightness matching the $2,299 Sony Bravia 9, more zones than the $1,699 Samsung QN90F, and gaming features rivaling the $2,799 S95F. The only Mini-LED offering better specs costs $1,000 more.
Best For
- Value-conscious enthusiasts wanting flagship features
- Bright room viewing without OLED prices
- PC gaming with 144Hz support
- Large families needing size options (up to 98″)
Bottom line
The TCL QM8K is what happens when premium TV tech finally goes mainstream. TCL has basically figured out how to deliver near-flagship performance without the flagship price tag. No, it won’t beat OLED’s perfect blacks or Sony’s processing magic — but it gets shockingly close for less than half the cost. At $1,299, this isn’t just great value, it’s a full-blown market disruptor. If you want the most performance per dollar without cutting corners on quality, the QM8K is hands-down the easiest TV to recommend in 2025.
Best Mini-LED Value TV
Mini-LED is the new hot buzzword in the TV industry lately, and the Best Mini-LED Value TV is the Hisense U8QG which scored a 87.9 out of 100 in our research.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The Hisense U8QG secured fourth place through an unbeatable combination of extreme brightness, unique features, and aggressive pricing. Our scoring revealed exceptional picture quality (35.5/40) powered by class-leading brightness, plus surprisingly good audio (8.5/10) that embarrasses competitors. YouTube reviewers consistently named it “Best Under $1000” (when on sale), while Reddit communities praised its giant-killer performance. It represents Hisense’s successful assault on the premium market with specs that seemed impossible at this price just two years ago.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Industry-leading 4,000 nits brightness
- Revolutionary USB-C DisplayPort input
- Excellent built-in audio with subwoofer
- Three HDMI 2.1 ports total
- Frequently discounted to $999
Cons
- Bulky 45mm thickness
- Processing can be overly aggressive
- Some blooming in dark scenes
- Viewing angles limit seating positions
- No G-Sync compatibility
The Standout Feature
The USB-C DisplayPort connection is genuinely revolutionary – connect a laptop, Steam Deck, or phone directly with a single cable carrying video, audio, and power. No other TV at any price offers this. Combined with 5,000 nits peak brightness, it doubles as the world’s brightest computer monitor.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (35.5/40): The brightness measurements are staggering – 3,900-4,000 nits peak in 10% windows, making it the brightest TV under $2,500 and rivaling professional mastering displays. With 1,500+ local dimming zones, contrast reaches 15,000:1 with deep, convincing blacks and minimal blooming. Quantum dots deliver 97.8% DCI-P3 coverage with vibrant, accurate colors. The main weaknesses are viewing angles (standard LCD limitation) and occasionally aggressive processing that can create artifacts in film content. Motion handling at 24fps sometimes shows judder that better processors eliminate.
Gaming Performance (17.5/20): Strong gaming implementation with 10.2ms input lag at 4K/60Hz – faster than Sony but behind Samsung/LG. The 144Hz panel supports all modern gaming standards with VRR working smoothly from 48-144Hz. Three HDMI 2.1 ports (one is the USB-C) handle multiple consoles, though placement on the side can be awkward. FreeSync Premium certification ensures tear-free gaming, though no G-Sync compatibility may disappoint Nvidia users.
Smart TV & Features (13.5/15): Google TV performs well with quick app launches and smooth navigation. The unique USB-C DisplayPort sets it apart – we tested laptops, phones, tablets, and handhelds, all working flawlessly. The port supplies 65W power while receiving 4K/120Hz signals. Built-in subwoofer and room correction are unexpected bonuses at this price.
Sound Quality (8.5/10): The 2.1.2 channel, 60W system surprises with actual bass response thanks to a built-in subwoofer – rare in modern flat panels. Dialogue clarity excels, Dolby Atmos creates convincing height, and maximum volume reaches theater levels without distortion. It’s the only TV under $2,000 where we didn’t immediately recommend a soundbar.
Build & Value (13/20): Build quality is adequate – mostly plastic construction that feels hollow when moved, though the 45mm thickness accommodates the superior audio system. At $1,299 matching TCL’s QM8K, it trades some dimming zones for higher peak brightness and unique features. Frequent sales dropping it to $999 make it an absolute steal.
Best For
- Creative professionals needing USB-C monitor functionality
- Bright room viewing without maximum budget
- Gaming laptop users wanting big-screen convenience
- Those prioritizing brightness above all else
Bottom line
The U8QG exemplifies Hisense’s strategy: overwhelm with specifications and unique features at disruptive pricing. The USB-C input alone justifies consideration for anyone using laptops or portable gaming devices, while the 4,000-nit brightness makes every other TV look dim in comparison. Yes, processing trails Sony and blooming can’t match OLED, but at $1,299 (often $999), it delivers features that don’t exist elsewhere at any price. For brightness enthusiasts and creative professionals, it’s an easy choice.
Best HDR Performance
While not everyone likes HDR, it is the future. HDR or High-Dynamic Range is very useful for dark TV shows and movies, making it easier to see, especially when the scene is at night.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The Panasonic Z95B earned its position through exceptional HDR mastery and the best built-in audio system in any TV. Our scoring revealed outstanding picture quality (37/40) with perfect black handling, though limited gaming features (15/20) and restricted availability hurt its overall ranking. Professional calibrators consistently choose Panasonic for reference displays, and it placed third in the Value Electronics Shootout. It’s the filmmaker’s TV – engineered for those who prioritize artistic intent over mass-market features.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Best-in-class HDR tone mapping
- Perfect 5.1.2 audio system built-in
- Reference color accuracy from factory
- Superior heat management for sustained brightness
- Best near-black detail retention
Cons
- 22ms gaming latency unacceptable for many
- Fire TV interface disappoints
- Limited to two HDMI 2.1 ports
- Not widely available globally
- Premium price with fewer features
The Standout Feature
Panasonic’s HDR tone mapping algorithm is unmatched, intelligently preserving detail in both shadows and highlights regardless of content mastering. Whether watching 1000-nit or 4000-nit content, the Z95B displays it correctly without clipping or crushing – something even Sony struggles with.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (37/40): The Master OLED panel delivers perfection in critical areas. Peak brightness reaches 1,950 nits – not the highest but with superior heat management maintaining it longer than competitors. The result is consistent HDR performance during extended viewing. Color accuracy is reference-grade with 96% DCI-P3 coverage and Delta-E under 1.0 from the factory – the best we’ve measured. Black performance earned perfect scores in shootouts with exceptional near-black detail retention that reveals shadow information others miss. The only deductions come from peak brightness trailing QD-OLED and occasionally conservative processing that prioritizes accuracy over enhancement.
Gaming Performance (15/20): The weakest aspect with 22ms input lag at 4K/60Hz – noticeable for any serious gaming. While two HDMI 2.1 ports support 4K/120Hz with VRR from 48-120Hz, the implementation feels like an afterthought. No FreeSync or G-Sync certification, limited VRR range, and the high latency make this unsuitable for competitive gaming. Casual players won’t mind, but enthusiasts should look elsewhere.
Smart TV & Features (12/15): Fire TV OS is the surprise weakness – slower than competitors with occasional stutters and a cluttered interface. App selection covers basics but lacks some niche services. The saving grace is excellent integration with professional calibration tools and extensive picture adjustment options most users won’t need but professionals appreciate.
Sound Quality (10/10 – Perfect Score): The 5.1.2 channel system with 70W of power embarrasses most soundbars. True three-dimensional audio with convincing height effects, chest-thumping bass extending to 40Hz, and dialogue clarity that adapts to content. Room calibration using built-in microphones optimizes performance for your space. It’s the only TV where external audio is optional, not necessary.
Build & Value (12.5/20): Build quality is exceptional with premium materials and tank-like construction designed for longevity. The unique swivel stand and excellent cable management show attention to detail. At $2,899, it’s $100 more than Samsung’s S95F while offering fewer features and less brightness. Limited availability in some markets further hurts value. You’re paying for specialized excellence rather than versatility.
Best For
- Film enthusiasts prioritizing accuracy
- Professional colorists and editors
- Those wanting exceptional built-in audio
- Viewers of varied HDR content sources
Bottom Line
The Panasonic Z95B is a specialist’s TV that excels at its core mission: displaying content exactly as creators intended with theater-quality sound. While it can’t match Samsung’s brightness, Sony’s processing, or LG’s gaming prowess, it offers something unique – uncompromised HDR accuracy with audio that eliminates soundbar necessity. At $2,899, it’s expensive for what it lacks but invaluable for what it perfects. Film purists and professionals will appreciate its priorities; everyone else might wonder why it costs so much.
Best Gaming Features
Let’s face it, TVs aren’t just for watching movies and TV shows, but also for playing games. Whether that be cloud gaming like NVIDIA GeForce Now, or PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X|S.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The LG G5 OLED is the kind of product that shoots for the moon — and nearly makes it — but stumbles on re-entry. It’s a bold swing packed with cutting-edge ideas, and when it works, it absolutely flies. Gaming performance is off the charts (19.5/20), and its new brightness tech is genuinely groundbreaking. But once you step into real-world viewing, things start to unravel. Picture quality (35/40) just isn’t as refined as its rivals, and inconsistent processing — especially visible in blind shootouts — keeps it from joining the true flagship elite.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Brightest W-OLED at 2,200 nits
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports (industry-leading)
- Sub-10ms gaming latency
- Best smart TV platform
- All gaming standards supported
Cons
- Severe processing issues (dithering/crushing)
- Last place in accuracy shootouts
- Image retention concerns reported
- First-gen panel technology risks
- Overly aggressive sharpening
The Standout Feature
The revolutionary 4-stack OLED structure achieves 2,200 nits peak brightness – the brightest traditional OLED ever made. This new panel technology promises to match QD-OLED brightness while maintaining W-OLED’s superior longevity, though first-generation growing pains are evident.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (35/40): The 4-stack panel delivers unprecedented W-OLED brightness at 2,200 nits peak, finally matching QD-OLED competitors. Color coverage reaches 93% DCI-P3 – good but trailing quantum dot variants. The infinite contrast ratio remains OLED’s strength with perfect blacks. However, significant issues emerged during testing: aggressive dithering creates visible noise in gradients, shadow detail crushing loses information competitors preserve, and oversharpening makes film content look processed. These processing flaws cost 5 full points and led to last-place shootout finishes despite superior specifications.
Gaming Performance (19.5/20): Gaming is where the G5 shines brightest with industry-leading 9.8ms input lag at 4K/60Hz. Four HDMI 2.1 ports (all 48Gbps) support any configuration – no other TV matches this. VRR operates flawlessly across all formats: HDMI Forum VRR, FreeSync Premium, and G-Sync Compatible certification. The 144Hz capability with perfect pixel response times delivers motion clarity that embarrasses competitors. Dolby Vision gaming support completes the package.
Smart TV & Features (14/15): WebOS 25 remains the best smart platform with instantaneous response, comprehensive app selection, and intuitive navigation. The Magic Remote with pointer control and backlit buttons sets the standard. Hands-free voice control works reliably, and integration with Apple HomeKit, Google Home, and Alexa covers all ecosystems. The interface is so good that external streaming devices become unnecessary.
Sound Quality (7/10): The 40W 2.2 channel system delivers adequate but unremarkable audio. Dialogue clarity is good, virtual surround processing helps, but bass is essentially absent below 100Hz. AI Sound Pro adapts to content type with moderate success. Most buyers will need a soundbar for satisfying movie audio.
Build & Value (10.5/20): Premium construction with metal and glass materials feels substantial. The slim 24mm profile looks elegant, though the wider stand requires larger furniture. At $2,499, it’s priced between the superior Samsung S95F ($2,799) and more reliable C5 ($1,699). First-generation panel technology risks and processing issues make the value proposition questionable. Early adopter tax applies heavily here.
Best For
- Hardcore gamers needing four HDMI 2.1 ports
- Early adopters wanting bleeding-edge panel tech
- LG ecosystem users heavily invested in WebOS
- Bright room viewing without QD-OLED
Bottom Line
The G5 is both brilliant and maddening — a TV that dominates the spec sheet but fumbles where it matters most: on-screen performance. Its new 4-stack panel is the kind of tech that feels five years ahead of its time, but right now, it’s more promise than polish. The aggressive image processing meant to elevate the picture instead ends up smearing fine detail and crushing subtle tones — the cinematic equivalent of turning a masterpiece into a meme.
At $2,499, you’re essentially paying to beta test the future. Gamers will love the insane connectivity and ultra-low latency, and for them, the trade-offs might be worth it. But for home theater purists chasing reference-grade performance, the smarter money is on the proven C5 or other flagship OLEDs that already have their act together.
The G5 is a fascinating glimpse of where display tech is headed — just not quite where it needs to be today.
Best Mid-Range OLED
Getting the best OLED TV might be a bit out of your price range, luckily LG offers a number of different OLED TVs, including the LG C5 OLED which is its most popular model.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The LG C5 earned its position as the safe, smart choice that nobody regrets buying. Our scoring revealed consistent excellence across all categories without any significant weaknesses – picture quality (35/40), gaming (19/20), and features (13.5/15) all impress. Reddit communities voted it most recommended TV with 4.8/5 from over 500 owners, while professional reviewers unanimously praised its refinement. It’s not revolutionary like the G5 or exceptional like the S95F, but it’s the TV that just works perfectly every single day.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports for ultimate flexibility
- Proven fifth-generation technology
- Perfect gaming implementation
- Excellent smart platform
- Superior reliability record
Cons
- Brightness trails QD-OLED competitors
- Incremental upgrade from C4
- Basic audio system
- No 144Hz support
- Safe rather than exciting
The Standout Feature
The maturity and refinement of fifth-generation OLED technology means zero surprises – no processing quirks, no panel lottery, no early adopter risks. With four HDMI 2.1 ports and every gaming feature standard, it’s the most versatile TV that never disappoints.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (35/40): Traditional W-OLED technology delivers exactly what’s expected. Peak brightness reaches 1,100 nits – sufficient for good HDR impact though trailing newer QD-OLED and 4-stack panels. The infinite contrast ratio provides perfect blacks without blooming, while 95% DCI-P3 coverage ensures accurate, vibrant colors. The Evo panel improves brightness by 20% over the C4 without sacrificing black levels. Processing is mature and refined – no oversharpening, proper film cadence handling, and excellent upscaling. It loses points only for brightness that can’t match flagships and incremental rather than revolutionary improvements.
Gaming Performance (19/20): LG perfected OLED gaming and the C5 benefits from years of refinement. Input lag measures 9.5ms at 4K/60Hz – imperceptible for any gaming scenario. Four HDMI 2.1 ports (all 48Gbps) means no juggling devices – PS5, Xbox, gaming PC, and soundbar all connect simultaneously. VRR works flawlessly with official G-Sync/FreeSync certification plus HDMI Forum VRR. The 120Hz panel delivers perfect pixel response without overshoot. Dolby Vision gaming and ALLM complete the package. Only deduction: no 144Hz support.
Smart TV & Features (13.5/15): WebOS 25 sets the standard with instant response times and every streaming service available. The redesigned interface is cleaner than previous versions while maintaining functionality. Magic Remote with pointer control and voice search works brilliantly. Smart home integration covers all major platforms. The Game Optimizer interface provides granular control over gaming settings with genre-specific presets.
Sound Quality (7/10): The 40W 2.2 channel system is acceptable but clearly the weak link. Dialogue remains clear, AI Sound Pro helps optimize for content, and virtual surround adds some spaciousness. However, bass is minimal and maximum volume lacks authority. Budget $200-300 for a soundbar to complete the experience.
Build & Value (14/20): Build quality is excellent with premium materials and exceptional quality control – defect rates under 1%. The minimalist design suits any decor. At $1,699, it’s perfectly positioned – $800 less than Samsung’s S95F, $800 less than the problematic G5, but offering 85% of their performance with superior reliability. Black Friday drops to $1,299 make it unbeatable.
Best For
- First-time OLED buyers wanting proven technology
- Gamers needing versatile connectivity
- Mixed-use households requiring reliability
- Those wanting flagship features without flagship prices
Bottom Line
The LG C5 OLED is the Toyota Camry of OLEDs – utterly reliable, surprisingly capable, and recommended by everyone who owns one. While it lacks the S95F’s brightness, G5’s ambition, or Sony’s processing magic, it delivers consistent excellence without drama. At $1,699 (often $1,299), it’s the OLED that makes sense for 90% of buyers. You might find TVs that do specific things better, but you won’t find one that does everything this well at this price.
Best Entry-Level OLED
Want OLED for even less? The LG B5 OLED has you covered, with a starting price of just $1,199.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The LG B5 represents the company’s entry point into OLED technology, scoring respectably with strong picture quality (30/40) but compromised by its 60Hz panel in an increasingly 120Hz world. Our research found it praised for perfect blacks and infinite contrast but criticized for gaming limitations. It’s the OLED you buy when picture quality matters more than refresh rate – perfect for movie enthusiasts on a budget, problematic for gamers seeking smooth motion.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Perfect OLED blacks, infinite contrast
- Excellent color accuracy (99% DCI-P3)
- webOS 25 interface excellence
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports
- Gallery-design aesthetics
Cons
- 60Hz panel limits gaming appeal
- VRR range limited to 40-60Hz
- No ALLM auto-switching
- 13ms input lag not competitive
- 700 nits insufficient for bright rooms
The Standout Feature
Perfect blacks with infinite contrast are OLED’s defining characteristic, and the B5 delivers this fundamental advantage flawlessly. Every dark scene reveals shadow detail impossible on LED/Mini-LED TVs. The self-emissive pixels eliminate blooming entirely, creating image depth that even flagship Mini-LEDs can’t match. For cinema content, this matters more than specifications suggest.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (30/40): OLED technology provides inherent advantages the B5 leverages effectively. Peak brightness reaches 700 nits in HDR highlights – modest compared to Mini-LED but sufficient in controlled lighting. The infinite contrast ratio creates stunning image depth with perfect black levels that never glow or bloom. Color coverage spans 99% DCI-P3 with excellent accuracy out of box. The α7 Gen7 AI processor handles upscaling competently and processes motion smoothly at 60Hz. Viewing angles are perfect – no color shift regardless of seating position. Uniformity is excellent with minimal banding. The main limitation is brightness – HDR impact suffers in bright rooms compared to Mini-LED competitors.
Gaming Performance (13.5/20): Here’s where the LG B5 stumbles. The 60Hz panel is inadequate for modern gaming in 2025 when competitors offer 120Hz or 144Hz at similar prices. Input lag measures 13ms – acceptable but not competitive. Four HDMI 2.1 ports provide connectivity, but only 48Gbps bandwidth limits future-proofing. VRR support (40-60Hz) prevents tearing but narrow range disappoints. No ALLM forces manual mode switching. Game Optimizer interface organizes settings nicely, and the near-instantaneous pixel response eliminates motion blur. For 30fps story games, it excels. For competitive gaming or PS5/Xbox Series X owners wanting 120fps, it frustrates.
Smart TV & Features (14/15): webOS 25 remains television’s best interface with intuitive navigation and quick responses. The Magic Remote with pointer functionality feels natural after brief adjustment. Built-in calibration tools (including filmmaker mode) satisfy enthusiasts. ATSC 3.0 tuner future-proofs broadcast reception. Four HDMI 2.1 ports beat competitors. Dolby Vision IQ adjusts brightness contextually. The only minor complaint: occasionally aggressive content recommendations.
Sound Quality (11.5/15): The 2.0 channel system with 20W output performs surprisingly well for built-in speakers. Dolby Atmos pass-through works perfectly with soundbars. Clear dialogue and decent bass response – still benefits from external audio but acceptable standalone.
Build & Value (19.8/20): Gallery-style thin profile measures just 21mm depth creating stunning wall-mount aesthetics. Premium metal construction feels solid. Minimal bezels maximize screen real estate. Cable management built into stand. Center-mounted stand fits most furniture. At $1,199 for 55″, the B5 delivers genuine OLED performance at LED prices. The 60Hz limitation is the calculated compromise that makes this price possible. For movie enthusiasts prioritizing picture quality over gaming, it offers phenomenal value. For gamers, the extra $200 for 120Hz OLEDs is worthwhile.
Best For
- Movie enthusiasts prioritizing picture quality
- Viewers in controlled lighting environments
- Upgrading from basic LED TVs
- 30fps story-driven gaming
Bottom Line
The B5 OLED succeeds as an entry-level OLED with perfect blacks and excellent picture quality, but the 60Hz panel limits its appeal in 2025’s high-refresh landscape. It’s the right TV for cinema purists on a budget, the wrong choice for serious gamers. Understanding this trade-off is essential – buy it for its strengths, not despite its weaknesses. At $1,199, OLED technology has never been more accessible.
Best Sports TV
Despite leagues making it harder and harder to watch sports, it’s still a popular use for a TV. And we’ve found the best Sports TV you can buy right now – the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The Samsung QN90F cements itself as Samsung’s best non-OLED option — the go-to choice for bright rooms and live sports. It’s unapologetically tuned for punch and clarity, delivering bold HDR highlights and motion handling that makes fast-paced games or Formula 1 look razor-sharp. In our testing, picture quality scored a strong 34/40, backed by stellar gaming features (18/20) that rival far pricier sets.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Best viewing angles of any LED/Mini-LED
- Exceptional anti-reflective coating
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports
- Strong sports motion handling
- No burn-in risk
Cons
- Only 720 dimming zones (competitors offer 1500+)
- No Dolby Vision support
- Visible blooming in dark scenes
- Price matches superior OLED options
- Default processing too aggressive
The Standout Feature
Samsung’s Ultra Viewing Angle technology combined with their anti-reflective coating makes this the only Mini-LED that maintains picture quality from any seat. Watch the game from the side couch and colors stay accurate – something no other LCD achieves.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (34/40): Neo QLED technology with quantum dots delivers impressive results. Peak brightness hits 2,068 nits – excellent for any content though trailing Hisense/TCL. The 720 local dimming zones provide good contrast at 12,000:1 with acceptable black levels, though visible blooming costs points. Color coverage reaches 92% DCI-P3 – slightly behind competitors but still vibrant. The Ultra Viewing Angle layer maintains colors to 70 degrees off-axis, unprecedented for LCD technology. Processing is Samsung’s strength with excellent motion handling for sports, though some find the default settings overly vivid.
Gaming Performance (18/20): Excellent implementation with 9.2ms input lag at 4K/60Hz – matching premium OLEDs. Four HDMI 2.1 ports (all 48Gbps) support any configuration without compromise. VRR works smoothly with FreeSync Premium Pro certification from 48-120Hz. Game mode maintains impressive picture quality with minimal degradation. Motion handling at 120Hz is particularly strong with no black frame insertion needed. Only loses points for no Dolby Vision gaming support – Samsung’s format war continues.
Smart TV & Features (12.5/15): Tizen remains divisive but functional with 7-second boot times and comprehensive apps. Samsung’s ecosystem integration leads if you own Galaxy devices. The solar remote eliminates battery hassles, and Multi-View showing four sources simultaneously is perfect for sports fans. Object Tracking Sound follows action on-screen effectively. Missing Google Cast and hands-free voice control that competitors include standard.
Sound Quality (7.5/10): The 60W 4.2.2 system outperforms most LED TVs with actual height channels creating convincing Atmos effects. Q-Symphony works brilliantly with Samsung soundbars for synchronized audio. Bass extends to 60Hz – better than most but still benefits from a subwoofer. Dialogue clarity impresses even during action scenes.
Build & Value (13/20): Construction feels premium with metal elements and minimal flex. The wide-set feet require large furniture but provide stability. At $1,699, it faces tough competition – TCL’s QM8K offers more zones and brightness for $400 less, while LG’s C5 OLED costs the same with perfect blacks. The value proposition depends on specific needs: anti-glare coating and wide viewing angles are unique selling points.
Best For
- Sports bars and bright living rooms
- Large families watching from different angles
- Samsung ecosystem users
- Those avoiding OLED burn-in risks
Bottom Line
The Samsung QN90F excels in specific scenarios where OLED struggles – bright rooms with multiple viewing positions. The combination of anti-glare coating and wide viewing angles is genuinely unique, making this the go-to choice for sports viewing with groups. At $1,699, you’re paying premium LED prices when OLEDs cost the same, but for daytime viewing and sports parties, nothing else delivers this specific combination of features. It’s a specialized tool that does certain things better than anything else.
Best Processing (Mini-LED)
With TVs these days, it’s not just about the panel, many TVs have processors inside that are dedicated to processing and upscaling content. And the Sony Bravia 9 Mini-LED is the best in both of those categories.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
star
The BRAVIA 9 represents Sony’s attempt to bring their legendary processing to Mini-LED technology, earning its position through exceptional picture refinement despite modest specifications. Our scoring revealed outstanding picture quality (36/40) powered by superior processing, though weak gaming features (16/20) and premium pricing limit its appeal. YouTube reviewers praised it for movies but noted it targets a narrow audience. It’s Sony proving that quality matters more than quantity in the specifications race.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Best Mini-LED processing available
- Virtual elimination of blooming
- Reference color accuracy
- Exceptional upscaling technology
- “King of Mini-LED” per shootout
Cons
- Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports
- 14ms gaming latency
- Overpriced versus competition
- Lower brightness than value brands
- Thick profile looks dated
The Standout Feature
Sony’s XR Backlight Master Drive with XR Triluminos Pro delivers the most accurate Mini-LED picture available. While competitors chase zone counts, Sony perfected zone control – their 800 zones outperform others’ 2000 through superior algorithms that eliminate blooming while preserving shadow detail.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (36/40): Sony’s approach prioritizes precision over power. Peak brightness reaches 2,500 nits – impressive though below Hisense/TCL monsters. The 800+ local dimming zones seem modest until you witness the implementation – blooming is virtually eliminated through predictive algorithms that anticipate content needs. Color accuracy is reference-grade with 95% DCI-P3 measured perfectly calibrated from factory. The real magic is processing: 480p cable looks acceptable, 1080p streams appear 4K-like, and 4K content reveals details competitors miss. Contrast reaches 18,000:1 – exceptional for Mini-LED. Only deductions: not as bright as value competitors.
Gaming Performance (16/20): The weakest aspect with 14ms input lag at 4K/60Hz – noticeable for competitive gaming though fine for single-player. Only two HDMI 2.1 ports severely limit multi-device setups, forcing constant cable swapping. VRR support exists but feels reluctant – 48-120Hz range without FreeSync or G-Sync certification. The saving grace is exceptional game mode picture quality that maintains Sony’s processing advantages. Perfect for cinematic games, problematic for esports.
Smart TV & Features (13/15): Google TV implementation is flawless with 6-second boots and buttery-smooth navigation. Sony’s BRAVIA Core streaming service with 80Mbps Pure Stream delivers near-Blu-ray quality on select titles – exclusive content that showcases the panel. Cognitive Processor XR enables unique features like auto-genre detection and scene optimization. Integration with PlayStation is seamless with auto HDR tone mapping.
Sound Quality (8.5/10): Acoustic Multi-Audio technology uses frame tweeters to position sound precisely with action. The 50W system delivers clear dialogue and decent immersion, though bass remains limited. Sony’s processing extends to audio with convincing 3D upscaling that adds genuine height. Still needs a soundbar for serious movie watching.
Build & Value (10/20): Premium construction with aluminum frame feels substantial, though the thick 55mm profile looks dated. Cable management is excellent with covers hiding connections. At $2,299, it’s overpriced – TCL’s QM8K offers superior brightness and zones for $1,000 less, while Sony’s own BRAVIA 8 II OLED costs just $700 more with perfect blacks. You’re paying for processing prowess that fewer viewers appreciate.
Best For
- Movie purists wanting Mini-LED longevity
- Cable/streaming viewers with mixed-quality sources
- Sony ecosystem users (PlayStation integration)
- Those prioritizing accuracy over specifications
Bottom Line
The Sony BRAVIA 9 is the thinking person’s Mini-LED – prioritizing refinement over raw power. Sony’s processing transforms everyday content in ways specification sheets can’t convey, making cable and streaming look better here than anywhere else. But at $2,299, it’s a tough sell when brighter, more featured competitors cost half as much. It wins shootouts for accuracy but loses sales for value. For those who understand and appreciate Sony’s processing magic, it’s worth considering; everyone else should buy the QM8K.
Best Gaming TV Under $1,000
Gaming TVs are great, but they can be expensive. Luckily, TCL has packed a lot of the must-have gaming features into a TV that’s under $1,000 in the QM7K Mini-LED.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The QM7K is TCL’s sweet spot — the gateway to premium performance without the premium price. It nails gaming with an 18/20 score and delivers surprisingly strong picture quality (32/40) that outperforms its class.
YouTube reviewers crowned it the budget gaming champ, and Reddit agrees, calling it the best value under $1,000. With 144Hz gaming, solid HDR, and pricing that undercuts 60Hz competitors, the QM7K proves TCL knows exactly how to play the value game — and win.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- True 144Hz for under $1000
- Sub-10ms input lag
- Decent HDR brightness
- Quantum dot colors
- Aggressive pricing
Cons
- Only 240 dimming zones
- Visible blooming in dark content
- Weak audio requires soundbar
- Panel uniformity lottery
- Basic build quality
The Standout Feature
Native 144Hz refresh rate at just $849 is unprecedented. Most TVs at this price offer 60Hz, with 120Hz being premium. TCL included 144Hz support that actually works, making this the cheapest path to high-refresh gaming that doesn’t sacrifice size or picture quality.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (32/40): Mini-LED implementation is competent if not spectacular. Peak brightness reaches 1,500 nits – enough for impactful HDR though half of flagship models. The 240 local dimming zones provide decent contrast at 8,000:1, though blooming becomes visible in challenging scenes. Quantum dots deliver 93% DCI-P3 coverage with good color saturation. Processing is TCL’s weak point – motion handling shows occasional judder, upscaling leaves artifacts, and film mode needs refinement. For the price, these compromises are acceptable. The panel uniformity lottery affects some units with visible DSE (dirty screen effect).
Gaming Performance (18/20 – Excellent): The killer feature with 9.8ms input lag at 4K/60Hz dropping further at higher refresh rates. The 144Hz panel operates natively – not interpolated – delivering genuine high-refresh gaming. Two HDMI 2.1 ports limit connectivity but both support full bandwidth. VRR works from 48-144Hz with FreeSync Premium certification, though no G-Sync support disappoints Nvidia users. Game mode preserves decent picture quality with acceptable color accuracy. ALLM switches instantly. This is legitimate gaming performance that cost $2,000+ last year.
Smart TV & Features (12.5/15): Google TV runs smoothly with quick app launches and minimal lag. The basic remote lacks premium features but includes essential shortcuts. Notable omission of ATSC 3.0 tuner at this price point. Cable management is basic but functional. The interface occasionally shows ads which annoys some users. Overall competent but clearly cost-optimized.
Sound Quality (6.5/10): The 30W 2.0 system is barely adequate with thin, harsh sound lacking any bass below 100Hz. Dialogue clarity suffers at low volumes while maximum output distorts. Virtual surround processing adds minimal spaciousness. A soundbar is essentially mandatory – budget another $150 minimum for acceptable audio.
Build & Value (15/20): Construction screams cost-cutting with plastic everywhere, though assembly quality is decent. The basic stand wobbles slightly but won’t tip. At $849, value is exceptional – you’re getting features that cost $1,500+ elsewhere. The QM8K is better for $450 more, but the QM7K delivers 80% of performance at 65% of price. Black Friday drops to $699 make it irresistible.
Best For
- Budget-conscious gamers wanting 144Hz
- First-time Mini-LED buyers
- Secondary gaming TV for bedrooms
- Those prioritizing features over refinement
Bottom Line
The TCL QM7K democratizes high-refresh gaming, bringing 144Hz to the masses at CRT-era prices. While it can’t match the refinement of flagships, it delivers the features that matter most for gaming at a price that doesn’t require financing. Yes, the QM8K is notably better, but at $849, the QM7K provides genuine value that makes premium features accessible. For gamers on a budget, this changes everything.
Best Gaming TV Under $500
If you’re on a budget, then the TCL QM6K is an absolutely great choice for a gaming TV starting at under $500. It’s available in 55″, 65″, and 75″ sizes too.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The TCL QM6K earned its position by bringing previously unthinkable features to the budget segment. Our scoring showed strong gaming performance (18/20) despite modest picture quality (30/40), creating the ultimate entry-level gaming display. YouTube reviewers called it the “budget gaming king,” while Reddit communities couldn’t believe 144Hz was possible at this price. It’s TCL’s market disruptor – forcing competitors to explain why their $1,000 TVs lack features found in this $449 model.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Unbelievable 144Hz at $449
- 11.5ms input lag competitive at this price
- Mini-LED technology at budget price
- Quantum dot colors
- FreeSync VRR support
Cons
- Only 60 dimming zones (severe blooming)
- 900 nits barely qualifies as HDR
- Terrible built-in audio
- Weak processing and upscaling
- Build quality reflects price
The Standout Feature
True 144Hz gaming at $449 for the 55-inch model breaks the industry. This isn’t marketing nonsense – it’s genuine 144Hz input accepting PC signals at 1440p/144Hz or 4K/120Hz. Last year’s $449 TVs offered 60Hz maximum. This changes the entire budget landscape.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (30/40): Mini-LED at this price requires compromises. Peak brightness hits 900 nits – sufficient for HDR effect but nowhere near flagships. The 60 local dimming zones struggle with blooming, creating visible halos around bright objects. Color coverage reaches 88% DCI-P3 through quantum dots – decent but not exceptional. Black levels disappoint at 5,000:1 contrast, appearing gray in dark rooms. Processing is basic with noticeable motion judder and mediocre upscaling. For $449, getting Mini-LED at all is impressive, even if implementation is flawed.
Gaming Performance (18/20): The gaming prowess shocks at this price. Input lag measures 11.5ms at 4K/60Hz – competitive with TVs costing triple and excellent for this price point. Two HDMI 2.1 ports support modern consoles, though bandwidth limitations mean choosing between 4K/120Hz or 1440p/144Hz. VRR operates from 48-144Hz via FreeSync, though implementation can be buggy. ALLM works reliably. Game mode maintains decent picture quality considering the price. This is legitimate high-refresh gaming for less than a console costs.
Smart TV & Features (12/15): Google TV runs adequately with occasional stutters during heavy multitasking. App selection covers mainstream services though some niche apps are missing. The basic remote lacks backlighting but includes gaming shortcuts. No ATSC 3.0 tuner, basic Wi-Fi 5, and minimal voice control. It’s functional but clearly where costs were cut.
Sound Quality (6/10): The 20W 2.0 system is genuinely poor with tinny, harsh sound completely lacking bass. Dialogue becomes muddy at low volumes while high volumes distort badly. Even basic TV speakers from five years ago sound better. A soundbar isn’t recommended – it’s required. Budget another $100 minimum for tolerable audio.
Build Quality & Design (6/8): Plastic construction feels hollow but won’t break with normal use. The stand wobbles noticeably but remains stable. At 55 inches, it’s surprisingly heavy, requiring two people for setup. Cable management is nonexistent. For $449, expectations should be minimal, and TCL meets them exactly.
Value Proposition (6.8/7): At $449 for legitimate 144Hz gaming, value is unmatched. Yes, picture quality is mediocre and audio is terrible, but the core gaming features rival $1,500 displays. The 65-inch at $649 is less compelling as the QM7K at $849 is significantly better. Black Friday drops to $349 for the 55-inch make it an absolute steal.
Best For
- Competitive gamers on extreme budgets
- Bedroom gaming setups
- First gaming TV for teenagers
- PC gamers wanting big-screen 144Hz
Bottom Line
The TCL QM6K shouldn’t exist at this price, yet here it is – 144Hz gaming for less than a mid-range soundbar costs. Picture quality won’t win awards and you’ll need external audio, but for competitive gaming on a shoestring budget, nothing comes close. At $449, it’s not about what it does poorly but what it does at all – democratizing high-refresh gaming for the masses.
Best 55″ TV Under $700
Big TV on a budget. That’s exactly what the Hisense U7N Mini-LED is, it does come in sizes from 55-inch all the way up to 85-inch, maxing out at $1,499.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The Hisense U7N earns its spot not by breaking records, but by doing everything well enough to keep everyone happy. It’s the definition of balance — respectable picture quality (31/40) and decent gaming chops (15/20) at a price that’s hard to argue with.
Reddit calls it the “safe budget pick,” and they’re right. Reviewers consistently praise its brightness and overall value, proving that Hisense knows how to stretch a dollar. The U7N isn’t flashy or groundbreaking — it’s simply reliable, affordable, and delivers where it counts. For most buyers, that’s more than enough.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Impressive 1,200 nits brightness
- 144 local dimming zones at this price
- Quantum dot color technology
- Decent built-in audio system
- Google TV built-in
Cons
- Only 60Hz limits gaming appeal
- 13ms input lag not competitive
- Some blooming in dark scenes
- Quality control inconsistencies
- Build quality reflects budget pricing
The Standout Feature
1,200 nits peak brightness at just $649 for 55 inches makes the U7N brighter than many $1,500 OLEDs. This Mini-LED implementation delivers genuinely impactful HDR highlights that shame budget LEDs. Combined with 144 local dimming zones, it creates contrast ratios approaching premium displays – all for the price of a weekend getaway.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (31/40): The Mini-LED backlight with 144 zones creates respectable contrast at approximately 6,000:1 – solid for the price but revealing blooming in high-contrast scenes. Peak brightness reaches 1,200 nits in HDR highlights – impressive for this tier and sufficient for bright rooms. Quantum dots deliver 90% DCI-P3 color coverage with good saturation though accuracy wavers in complex gradients. The processing handles upscaling adequately but motion occasionally stutters during fast panning. Black levels are acceptable but can’t match OLED’s perfect darkness. Panel uniformity varies by unit – some show visible dirty screen effect. Overall, picture quality exceeds price expectations but falls short of premium displays.
Gaming Performance (15/20): Input lag measures 13ms at 4K/60Hz – acceptable but not competitive with sub-10ms displays. The 60Hz panel limits appeal to serious gamers when competitors offer 120Hz or 144Hz at similar prices. Two HDMI 2.1 ports provide basic connectivity but restrict multi-console setups. VRR support (48-60Hz) prevents tearing though narrow range disappoints. ALLM works reliably for automatic mode switching. Game mode preserves decent picture quality without excessive degradation. The near-instantaneous pixel response minimizes motion blur. For casual gaming it performs adequately; competitive gamers should spend more.
Smart TV & Features (12/15): Google TV delivers smooth navigation with quick app launches and comprehensive streaming support. The included voice remote works reliably though lacks premium materials. Built-in Chromecast and Google Assistant integration add convenience. ATSC 3.0 tuner future-proofs broadcast reception. Two HDMI 2.1 ports limit connectivity flexibility. Cable management is basic but functional. The interface occasionally pushes promotional content but remains mostly unobtrusive.
Sound Quality (7.5/10): The 30W 2.1 system surprises with clear dialogue and some bass presence – genuinely better than most budget TVs. Dolby Atmos support adds spatial dimension though height effects remain subtle. Maximum volume reaches adequate levels without excessive distortion. Still benefits from a soundbar but acceptable for standalone use in smaller rooms.
Build & Value (12.7/15): Construction uses primarily plastic but assembly feels solid without excessive flex. The central stand design works on most furniture though wobbles slightly. At $649 for 55 inches, value is excellent – you’re getting Mini-LED technology with quantum dots and local dimming for basic LED money. Quality control concerns emerge in Reddit threads with some units showing panel issues. Black Friday drops to $549 make it exceptional value. For buyers wanting maximum brightness per dollar, this delivers.
Best For
- Budget shoppers wanting Mini-LED tech
- Bright room viewing without OLED prices
- Casual gaming and mixed-use households
- Size upgrades on tight budgets
Bottom Line
The Hisense U7N succeeds as a no-surprises budget Mini-LED that prioritizes brightness and local dimming over gaming features or processing refinement. It’s not the TV to buy for best-in-class anything, but rather the safe choice when budgets dictate maximum screen size and brightness per dollar. At $649, it makes Mini-LED technology accessible to mainstream buyers. Just understand you’re trading polish and features for raw specs and affordability.
Best QD-OLED Under $1000
QD-OLED is the newest version of OLED, technically they’re two different technologies, but put together it makes OLED panels much brighter without ruining what makes OLED special – picture quality.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The Samsung S90F secured its position as last year’s luxury at this year’s budget price. Our scoring revealed excellent picture quality (34/40) and strong gaming performance (17/20) that would rank higher at original pricing, but clearance availability and 2024 firmware limit its appeal. Reddit communities called it “the steal if you can find it,” while professional reviewers noted it delivers 80% of S95F performance at 40% of the price. It represents Samsung’s volume QD-OLED – less refined than the flagship but genuinely premium at clearance pricing.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- QD-OLED technology at clearance pricing
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports
- 96% DCI-P3 quantum dot colors
- Perfect blacks, infinite contrast
- Premium build quality
Cons
- No Dolby Vision support
- 2024 processor lacks latest AI
- Limited/no warranty extensions
- Availability spotty as stock depletes
- No ATSC 3.0 tuner
The Standout Feature
QD-OLED technology at $999 is unprecedented. This isn’t budget OLED like the LG B5 – it’s genuine quantum dot OLED with the same panel technology as $2,799 flagships. The combination of perfect blacks, vibrant quantum dot colors, and 1,200 nits brightness creates an image that embarrasses many 2025 mid-range models. At clearance prices, nothing competes.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (34/40): QD-OLED panels deliver perfect blacks with infinite contrast – every pixel turns completely off creating absolute darkness impossible on LED/Mini-LED. Peak brightness reaches 1,200 nits in HDR highlights – brighter than standard W-OLED though dimmer than 2025’s QD-OLEDs. Quantum dots provide 96% DCI-P3 color coverage with exceptional saturation and purity that W-OLED can’t match. The 2024 Neural Quantum processor handles motion smoothly and upscales competently though lacks 2025’s AI enhancements. Viewing angles are perfect with zero color shift. The matte finish reduces reflections effectively. Main limitation: no Dolby Vision support – Samsung’s stubborn omission that frustrates some buyers.
Gaming Performance (17/20): Input lag measures 10ms at 4K/60Hz – competitive but not class-leading. Four HDMI 2.1 ports provide full 48Gbps bandwidth on all inputs – beating many 2025 competitors. VRR works from 20-120Hz with FreeSync Premium though no official G-Sync certification. ALLM switches modes automatically. The 0.1ms pixel response time eliminates motion blur entirely. Game mode preserves excellent picture quality with minimal color accuracy loss. For Xbox and PlayStation gaming, this excels. PC gamers wanting 144Hz should look elsewhere.
Smart TV & Features (11.5/15): Tizen 2024 runs smoothly with quick app launches though interface feels dated compared to 2025’s webOS or Google TV. The included solar-charging remote is convenient but basic. Gaming Hub aggregates cloud gaming services nicely. No ATSC 3.0 tuner disappoints for future broadcast reception. Four HDMI 2.1 ports exceed competitors. SmartThings integration works well for home automation. The interface pushes Samsung services occasionally but remains mostly unobtrusive.
Sound Quality (7/10): The 40W 2.1 system delivers adequate performance with clear dialogue and some bass presence. Object Tracking Sound adds directional audio that enhances immersion. Dolby Atmos support works with soundbars. Still benefits from external audio but acceptable for casual viewing.
Build & Value (13.5/15): Premium metal construction feels substantially built. The slim profile measures just 25mm depth creating elegant wall-mount aesthetics. Central stand fits most furniture. At $999 for 55 inches, value is exceptional – you’re getting flagship QD-OLED technology for budget OLED pricing. Limited availability as clearance stock depletes. Quality control is excellent with minimal reported issues. Black Friday pricing at $899 makes it irresistible for those who find stock.
Best For
- Value shoppers wanting premium technology
- Movie enthusiasts prioritizing picture quality
- Console gamers (PS5/Xbox)
- Buyers comfortable with previous-gen models
Bottom Line
The Samsung S90F is the rare deal that feels almost too good to be true — last year’s flagship, now priced like a mid-ranger. At $999, you’re getting QD-OLED performance that rivals 2025 models costing nearly twice as much.
Sure, it skips Dolby Vision and runs on older 2024 firmware, but those trade-offs fade fast once you see the picture quality. This is premium display tech at a price that feels downright rebellious.
If your priority is jaw-dropping image quality over bleeding-edge features, the S90F is the steal of the year. Just move quickly — clearance stock like this doesn’t hang around.
Best TV Under $400
Even if you don’t want to spend much on a new TV, that doesn’t mean you’re stuck with a terrible TV. The TCL C6KS Mini-LED is a really good option, having scored 75.8 out of 100 in our scoring, and it starts at just $399 for a 50-inch model.
Rating
star
star
star
star
star_empty
The TCL C6KS barely sneaks onto the leaderboard — but that’s exactly what makes it interesting. It delivers Mini-LED tech at a price where you’d normally be stuck with basic edge lighting, and that alone earns it respect. Our scoring showed solid picture quality (28/40) and gaming performance (14/20) that hit the essentials without trying to impress.
Reddit dubbed it the “minimum viable 4K TV,” and that’s honestly spot on. For under $400, it brings local dimming, 4K, and a surprisingly complete feature set to the bargain aisle. It’s not refined, but it proves TCL can squeeze premium tech into budget territory better than anyone else.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Mini-LED at under $400
- Quantum dot color technology
- Google TV built-in
- 48 local dimming zones at this price
- Unbeatable value proposition
Cons
- Only 600 nits brightness
- Terrible built-in audio
- 60Hz limits gaming appeal
- Significant quality control issues
- Build quality reflects ultra-budget pricing
The Standout Feature
Mini-LED backlighting at $399 makes local dimming accessible to buyers who previously couldn’t afford it. While the 48 zones can’t match premium displays’ thousands, having any local dimming at this price is remarkable. Combined with quantum dot color, it creates contrast and vibrancy that basic edge-lit LEDs can’t approach – democratizing premium features for mainstream budgets.
Performance Summary
Picture Quality (28/40): The Mini-LED implementation with 48 local dimming zones provides basic contrast control at approximately 4,000:1 – acceptable though blooming is visible in challenging scenes. Peak brightness reaches 600 nits – barely qualifying as HDR but sufficient for moderately lit rooms. Quantum dots deliver 85% DCI-P3 color coverage with decent saturation though accuracy wavers in complex gradients. The basic processor handles standard content adequately but upscaling reveals artifacts and motion shows judder during fast movement. Black levels are mediocre – better than edge-lit but nowhere near OLED darkness. Panel uniformity varies significantly by unit with visible banding and dirty screen effect common. Overall, picture quality meets minimum standards for acceptable 4K HDR viewing.
Gaming Performance (14/20): Input lag measures 12ms at 4K/60Hz – acceptable for casual gaming but not competitive. The 60Hz panel limits appeal when even budget competitors offer higher refresh rates. One HDMI 2.1 port provides basic connectivity but restricts multi-device setups. VRR support (48-60Hz) prevents tearing though extremely narrow range disappoints. No ALLM forces manual mode switching. Game mode preserves acceptable picture quality without excessive degradation. For story-driven single-player games, it performs adequately. Competitive gamers should spend more.
Smart TV & Features (11.5/15): Google TV delivers smooth navigation with comprehensive streaming app support. The basic remote functions reliably though feels cheap. Built-in Chromecast adds convenience for mobile casting. No ATSC 3.0 tuner limits future broadcast reception. Single HDMI 2.1 port severely restricts connectivity flexibility. Cable management is nonexistent. The interface occasionally displays aggressive advertising that annoys users. Overall functional but clearly cost-optimized at every opportunity.
Sound Quality (5.5/10): The 16W 2.0 system delivers barely adequate performance with thin, weak sound lacking any bass below 150Hz. Dialogue clarity suffers at low volumes while maximum output distorts easily. No virtual surround processing. A soundbar is mandatory even for casual viewing – budget another $100 minimum for acceptable audio. This is the C6KS’s most significant compromise.
Build & Value (13/15): Construction uses exclusively plastic with noticeable flex and gaps. The basic stand wobbles concerning amounts but won’t tip under normal use. At $399 for 50 inches, value is exceptional – you’re getting Mini-LED technology with quantum dots and local dimming for less than basic LED pricing from major brands. Quality control concerns appear frequently in reviews with panel uniformity issues and early failures. Black Friday drops to $349 make it remarkable value. For buyers needing maximum screen size per dollar who accept significant compromises, this delivers.
Best For
- First-time 4K TV buyers on strict budgets
- Small bedrooms or apartments
- Secondary TVs for guest rooms
- Upgrading from 1080p on minimal budget
Bottom Line
The TCL C6KS succeeds by making Mini-LED technology accessible to buyers who couldn’t otherwise afford it. At $399, it’s not about excellence but rather delivering acceptable 4K HDR performance with features that cost triple elsewhere. Picture quality is mediocre, audio is terrible, and build quality feels cheap – but you’re getting quantum dots and local dimming for PlayStation prices. Understanding this trade-off is essential: buy it for democratizing premium technologies, not despite the compromises. For budget-conscious buyers, this represents the absolute minimum viable modern TV.
Honorable Mentions
These are TVs that didn’t quite make the cut for the above categories, but are still very good options. These all scored over 70 out of 100 in our scoring system.
Under $1,000
Sony X90L Mini-LED (2024)
$949
Sony’s volume Mini-LED brings cognitive processor XR excellence to under $1,000 pricing. Delivers 1,200 nits brightness, full array local dimming with 80 zones, and exceptional motion handling. The processing remains Sony’s advantage – upscaling and smoothing exceed competitors at this price. Gaming features include 120Hz and low 11ms input lag. Best for buyers wanting Sony picture quality without flagship pricing. Limited to 80 zones means blooming exceeds premium models.
Samsung Q80D QLED (2024)
$949
Samsung’s mid-range QLED delivers excellent anti-glare coating, wide viewing angles for LED tech, and solid gaming features (120Hz, 10ms lag). Full array local dimming with 100 zones provides decent contrast though blooming is visible. Peak brightness reaches 1,100 nits – adequate for bright rooms. Four HDMI 2.1 ports. Tizen interface runs smoothly. Best for sports viewers and bright rooms where Samsung’s anti-reflective technology excels. Versatile all-arounder without standout excellence.
TCL QM85 Mini-LED (2024)
$899
TCL’s step-down from QM8K maintains impressive specs at lower pricing. Delivers 2,800 nits brightness with 480 local dimming zones – half the QM8K but still exceptional for under $900. Includes 144Hz gaming, quantum dots, and Google TV. Best for buyers wanting near-flagship brightness who can sacrifice some zone count. Picture quality sits between QM7K and QM8K. At $799 on sale, it’s remarkable value for gaming-focused viewers.
Hisense U7QG Mini-LED (2024)
$913
Hisense’s mid-range Mini-LED delivers 1,500 nits brightness, 180 local dimming zones, and quantum dots at aggressive pricing. Includes 120Hz gaming with decent 12ms input lag. Google TV interface. Four HDMI 2.1 ports. Best for buyers wanting significant brightness upgrade from basic LEDs without flagship costs. Quality control better than budget Hisense models but panel uniformity varies. At $749 on sale, solid value for mixed-use viewing.
Under $500
Hisense U6N Mini-LED (2025)
$499
Hisense’s entry-level Mini-LED punches way above its weight. You’re getting 60 local dimming zones, quantum dots, and 800 nits of brightness — specs that used to live in the $800 range — all at a shockingly low price.
The 60Hz panel and 15ms input lag won’t thrill serious gamers, but for movie nights or streaming binges, the picture quality easily outperforms expectations. The Google TV interface runs smooth and responsive, making it a great plug-and-play option for casual viewers.
TCL’s entry QLED brings quantum dots to budget pricing with respectable 700 nits brightness. Full array local dimming with 40 zones provides basic contrast control. Google TV interface. 60Hz panel with 14ms lag suits casual gaming only. Picture quality exceeds edge-lit competitors through local dimming implementation. Best for buyers wanting quantum dot color at minimum cost. At $349 on sale, solid budget choice for mixed-use viewing.
Roku Select Series (2025)
$219
Roku’s first branded TVs deliver their excellent interface with acceptable picture quality. QLED panel with quantum dots provides vibrant colors though limited local dimming (24 zones on 55″) restricts contrast. Peak brightness reaches 650 nits – barely HDR-capable but functional. Best feature is Roku Voice Remote Pro with hands-free voice control. For Roku ecosystem fans wanting maximum streaming convenience, it’s the safest budget choice. Picture quality trails Hisense/TCL but interface excellence compensates.
